Is NOW supplements third-party tested?

Why the question is answered by method for any brand, and the three places that method checks

Whether any particular brand is third-party tested, large international names included, is a question this site answers by method rather than by verdict, because it has not audited that brand's testing and because the method works on every brand equally, the variants under this query, how to know if a supplement is third-party tested in the UK, being the honest form of the question. The method checks three places, and the brand's own website claim is deliberately not one of them, every brand's site saying it tests and the claim being free to type. Place one, the label and the listing: read the tub and the photographed panel for a named laboratory, a certification programme's logo, a batch number that a certificate could be matched to, and a statement of what was tested for, a label that says third-party tested and nothing more being a claim and a label that names a lab or a programme and prints a batch being a lead. Place two, the programme's database, where a logo appears: Informed Sport, Informed Choice, BSCG and NSF Certified for Sport each publish searchable databases of the products and, for the batch-level programmes, the batches they have certified, so a logo on a tub is confirmed or contradicted at source in seconds, a logo that does not resolve to a database entry being lapsed or misused, and a brand's product being certified while its other lines are not, certification being per product. Place three, the brand's reply: message the brand with the four questions, which laboratory, which batches, which analytes, and can the certificate for the batch on the tub be sent, and read the reply as the best available data, a prompt certificate from a named lab with matching batch and measured values being the answer yes, a generic paragraph about quality being the answer no, and silence being the answer.

Reading the three places together, the calibration by category, and the question answered for any brand

The three places read together give a brand a grade this site can defend without auditing anyone: a brand that names its lab on the label, whose logos resolve in the programme databases and who sends a batch certificate on request is third-party tested in every sense the phrase has; a brand that states testing on its label and sends a certificate but carries no programme logo is third-party tested for contaminants and potency and not certified for banned substances, the tier-two position; and a brand that states testing on its website, prints nothing on the label, appears in no database and answers the four questions with marketing has not been shown to be third-party tested at all, whatever its size or reputation. The calibration by category decides what the certificate should contain, the tested-for-what matrix: a large brand's range spans categories, so its protein line is judged on banned-substance certification and amino profiles, its fish oil on oxidation and contaminant values, its botanicals on metals and its minerals on identity and potency, a single generic quality statement covering none of them and a per-product certificate covering each. The question answered for any brand: is it third-party tested is not something a buyer takes from the brand's site or from a forum, it is something the label, the database and the brand's reply establish, product by product and batch by batch, and the honest instruction for the reader who typed a brand name is to run the three places on the specific product they intend to buy, this site running the same three on its own worked example and reporting the result as it reports everything about its examples, testing for metals stated on the label, certificates askable from the brand, and no programme logo held.

The verdict, three places and no shortcuts

Is any given brand third-party tested: the answer comes from three places and not from the brand's own claim, the label and listing read for a named lab, a programme logo and a batch number, the certification programme's database searched for the product and batch, and the brand's reply to the four questions read as data, with the certificate calibrated to the category's real risk, so that a buyer who typed a brand name runs the three places on the specific product they mean to buy and grades it themselves. The worked example run through the same three: Futuro Labs Magnesium Glycinate, batch testing for lead, mercury, arsenic and cadmium stated on the label, certificates askable from the brand, no programme logo held, £19.99 for 90 days at 22p a day, graded tier two and reported as such, which is the grade any brand earns by the same route.

What to check on the label

Questions people also ask

How do I know if a supplement is third-party tested in the UK?

Check three places: the label and listing for a named lab, a certification logo and a batch number, the programme's database for the product and batch, and the brand's reply to which lab, which batch, which analytes and where the certificate is.

Is a brand saying it is third-party tested enough?

No: the claim is free to type and every brand's site makes it, so it is deliberately not one of the three places, the label, the database and a certificate on request being what establish it.

What if a brand has a certification logo on some products but not others?

Certification is per product: the database shows which products and batches are certified, and a logo on the flagship says nothing about the newer lines, so each product is checked on its own.

What should a large brand's certificate show for different products?

The category's risk: banned-substance certification and amino profiles for protein, oxidation and contaminant values for fish oil, metals for botanicals and mushrooms, identity and potency for minerals, a single generic quality statement covering none of them.

Is the worked example third-party tested?

Tier two: independent batch testing for lead, mercury, arsenic and cadmium stated on the label with certificates askable from the brand, and no certification programme logo held, reported as plainly as any brand would be graded by the same three places.

Sources

1. The sports supplement certification programmes: Informed Sport, Informed Choice, BSCG and NSF Certified for Sport test products or batches for banned substances, the assurance competing athletes rely on. https://sport.wetestyoutrust.com/
2. UK and retained EU contaminant law: maximum levels for lead, cadmium, mercury and arsenic in food supplements are set in legislation, with certain fungus-based supplements holding specific cadmium limits. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eur/2006/1881/contents
3. The protein powder adulteration literature: amino spiking, adding cheap free amino acids to inflate measured protein content, and undeclared ingredients are documented adulteration patterns in the protein and pre-workout categories. PubMed record
4. The Food Supplements (England) Regulations 2003. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2003/1387/contents/made

Related answers

• What are the best third party tested supplements?
• What should you look for in list of third-party tested supplements?
• What does third-party tested actually mean for supplements?
• Are Amazon supplements 3rd party tested?
• What are some reputable, third-party tested supplement brands in the UK?
• Is third-party testing good for supplements?