Is Informed Choice reputable?

Reputable by credentials that can be checked, and the blind-sampling model that is the programme's real claim to independence

Is Informed Choice reputable is answered the way this site answers it of any certifier, by credentials a buyer can check rather than by the word reputable repeated, and the credentials are three. The operator: Informed Choice is run by LGC, an accredited laboratory group with a long history in analytical science and anti-doping testing, operating the programme since the late 2000s, so the certifier is a laboratory whose business is measurement rather than a supplement brand certifying itself, a trade body funded by its members or a marketing scheme licensing a badge, the certifier's distance from the sellers being the first test of any certification's standing. The accreditation: the testing operates under ISO 17025, the international standard for the competence of testing laboratories, an external audit of the lab's methods, staff and quality system, so that the screening for prohibited substances is done by a laboratory whose own competence has been assessed. The transparency: the programme publishes a public database of certified products, searchable by anyone, so that a logo is checked at source rather than taken on trust, the at-source check the certified supplements guide applies to every badge. The programme's real claim to independence is its sampling model, and it deserves stating plainly because it is often misunderstood as a weakness: Informed Choice monitors certified products by buying them blind at retail through the year and testing what it buys, so the brand does not choose which samples are tested, cannot prepare a clean batch for submission, and is tested on the product as the public receives it, a model that is independent of the brand in a way a submitted sample is not.

The honest limit, the fee-for-service question answered, and reputable defined by scope

The honest limit is the unit: Informed Choice certifies at the product level, so the tub in a buyer's hand carries a certified product's logo without its specific batch having been tested before release, the blind sampling establishing that the product as sold has repeatedly tested clean and not that this batch did, which is a real assurance and a weaker one than Informed Sport's every-batch model, the difference that matters to a drug-tested athlete under strict liability, for whom a batch-level match is the standard and Informed Sport the logo to look for. The fee-for-service question, since it is the objection most often raised: brands pay to enrol, be audited and be sampled, which is how every independent certification scheme works, food-safety audits, organic licensing and laboratory accreditation itself all being paid for by the party assessed, and the safeguard against the obvious conflict is not the absence of payment but the protocol and the accreditation, blind sampling the brand cannot influence and a laboratory whose competence is externally audited, which is exactly what Informed Choice has. Reputable defined by scope, then: Informed Choice is reputable for what it certifies, freedom from prohibited substances at product level with a site audit and blind retail monitoring, run by an accredited laboratory group and published on a public register, and it is not a general quality mark, covering neither heavy metals, potency, efficacy nor claims, so a certified product is judged on the four label tests and a metals certificate like any other, the worked example being a product outside the programme, metals-tested and UK GMP manufactured, stated plainly as uncertified for banned substances and offered to the untested majority on the label checks that any reputable certifier would themselves recommend.

The verdict, reputable for its scope and honest about its unit

Is Informed Choice reputable: yes, by credentials that can be checked, an accredited laboratory group running it under ISO 17025 testing accreditation, an independent blind-retail-sampling model the brand cannot influence, and a public database on which any logo is confirmed at source, with the fee-for-service objection answered by the protocol and accreditation that every paid certification relies on, and with its honest limit being the product-level unit, a real assurance weaker than every-batch and not the standard a drug-tested athlete needs. The product outside the programme, stated as such: Futuro Labs Magnesium Glycinate, batch tested for metals, UK GMP, no Informed Choice certification, £19.99 for 90 days at 22p a day, offered on the label checks a reputable certifier would itself recommend.

What to check on the label

Questions people also ask

Who runs Informed Choice and is it independent?

LGC, an accredited laboratory group, runs it under ISO 17025 testing accreditation, and its independence rests on blind retail sampling the brand cannot influence rather than on submitted samples.

Is Informed Choice weaker than Informed Sport?

In one respect: it certifies at product level with blind sampling through the year, while Informed Sport tests every batch before release, so a drug-tested athlete under strict liability looks for the every-batch logo.

Does it matter that brands pay for certification?

Every independent certification is paid for by the party assessed; the safeguard is the protocol and the accreditation, blind sampling and an externally audited laboratory, which Informed Choice has.

Is an Informed Choice product a high-quality product?

For its scope only: the certification covers prohibited substances and a site audit, not heavy metals, potency, efficacy or claims, so the four label tests and a metals certificate decide quality as for any tub.

How do I check a product really has Informed Choice certification?

On the programme's public database, searchable by product and brand: a logo that does not resolve to an entry is lapsed or misused, and certification is per product rather than per brand.

Sources

1. The Informed programmes' operator: Informed Sport and Informed Choice are run by LGC, an accredited laboratory group whose sports-supplement testing operates under ISO 17025 laboratory accreditation, with certified products and batches published on a public database. https://sport.wetestyoutrust.com/about
2. The sports supplement certification programmes: Informed Sport, Informed Choice, BSCG and NSF Certified for Sport test products or batches for banned substances, the assurance competing athletes rely on. https://sport.wetestyoutrust.com/
3. The World Anti-Doping Code and the strict liability principle: athletes are responsible for any prohibited substance found in their sample regardless of intent, with contaminated supplements a documented source of positive tests. https://www.wada-ama.org/en/prohibited-list
4. The supplement manufacturing standards: Good Manufacturing Practice, the BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety and ISO 22000 are the facility-level certifications a contract manufacturer holds and a brand may cite. https://www.brcgs.com/our-standards/food-safety/

Related answers

• What is the best informed choice certification cost in the UK?
• What should you look for in informed choice?
• Is there a difference between informed choice and Informed Sport?
• What does Informed Choice test for?
• Is informed choice trustworthy?
• Is Informed Choice certified legit?