Are 21st Century vitamins third party tested?

Testing is sized to the price: what a value brand's cost floor affords, the three parties of a test defined, and what first-party testing in a registered American facility is and is not

Are the vitamins of an American value brand third party tested is a question that can be answered, in outline, before the brand is asked, because testing is sized to the price. A brand built to a cost floor, selling a large count of a plain vitamin for a few pounds, runs the testing that the floor affords and not the testing it cannot carry, and the two are different in kind. What the floor affords is first-party testing: the manufacturer testing its own batches for identity, assay and, periodically, contaminants, in its own or a contract laboratory, as the American manufacturing rules for supplements require of every registered facility, with the records kept for the federal agency's inspectors. What the floor cannot carry is lot-by-lot third-party testing: every batch screened by an independent body and the result published by lot number in a public database, which costs a fee per product and per lot that a value brand's margin does not contain and that its customers, buying on price, would not pay. A value brand's honest answer to the question is therefore usually that its products are tested, by itself, under a real set of rules, and not third-party tested in the lot-by-lot sense, and a buyer who understands the price understands the answer.

The phrase needs its definition, because it is borrowed from the international vocabulary of conformity assessment and is used loosely on labels. A first-party test is performed by the organisation that provides the product, the maker testing its own batches. A second-party test is performed by someone with a user interest, a retailer, a team, a buyer sending a tub to a laboratory. A third-party test is performed by a body independent of both provider and user, a certification programme, an accredited laboratory commissioned by neither side, an independent service buying at retail. A value brand's testing is first party by definition, and a label on its tub reading tested for quality or laboratory tested describes the first party in words that sound like the third; the brand is not lying, and the buyer is reading the wrong party into the phrase.

What first-party testing in a registered American facility is worth should be stated fairly, because it is more than nothing. A facility registered with the federal agency is subject to the current good manufacturing practice rules for supplements, which require written procedures, identity testing of ingredients, specifications for the finished product and release against them, batch records and complaint handling, and the agency inspects against those rules and publishes warning letters when a facility fails; a value brand made in such a facility has a documented process that a regulator can and does check, which is a third-party audit of the process and not a third-party test of any lot. What it is not worth is a document a buyer can read for their tub: the release records are the maker's, they are not published by lot, and a buyer cannot search a database for their batch unless the brand has taken the one route to an independent mark that the next section describes.

Testing sized to the price, three parties defined and the first party placed fairly, and the one route a value brand takes to an independent mark, what it does and does not give a UK buyer, the brand left unnamed, and the worked example, which is the next section.

The one route to an independent mark, the pharmacopoeia verification programme and its database searched by product; what the mark does and does not give a UK buyer; the brand left unnamed; the worked example placed by the three parties; and the verdict

The one route by which an American value brand gets an independent mark on its tubs is the American pharmacopoeia's dietary supplement verification programme, a voluntary scheme under which the manufacturer is audited, the product is tested for identity, strength, purity and disintegration, retail samples are bought and tested on an ongoing basis, and the verified products are listed in a public database. It is a real third-party verification of the product as sold in the United States, it is used mainly by American mass-market and value brands because it is the mark their pharmacy and grocery customers recognise, and it is checked by searching the programme's database for the product rather than by reading the tub or assuming from the brand; a value brand will typically have some products verified and others not, and the answer to the question in the title is therefore different for different tubs from the same brand. A buyer with a specific product in mind searches the database for it, and a product that is listed is third-party verified in the programme's sense, which covers the product's contents and the facility's process, while a product that is not listed is first-party tested only, however the label reads.

What the mark does and does not give a UK buyer is worth separating. It gives assurance about the product as sold in the United States: that the facility was audited, that the formulation was tested and that retail samples have been surveyed, which for a vitamin at a value price is a strong position. It does not give a lot-by-lot screen for banned substances, which only a sports certification programme provides and which a vitamin from a mass-market facility is unlikely to need. And it does not follow the tub across the ocean: a verified product bought from an American seller and shipped to the UK without a UK or EU importer's address has been imported by the buyer in law, with age and heat on the journey that the programme's retail surveys in the United States never see, and the UK buyer reads the importer's address and the expiry on the tub as the two records the mark cannot supply.

The brand is not named in the body of this page, by rule, and no claim is made here about which of its products are or are not verified, because that is a fact the database holds and a page would get wrong within a year; the buyer searches it. The value brand case is the general one: first-party testing in a registered facility, which is real, no lot-by-lot third-party certification, which the price cannot carry, and a verification mark on some products that the database confirms product by product. The same analysis covers every American value vitamin brand a reader has in mind.

The worked example is placed by the same three parties: {FL} is tested first party on release in a UK facility certified to GMP and BRC, and third party by an independent UK contract laboratory that tests each batch for lead, mercury, arsenic and cadmium with the certificate for a lot number released to a buyer on request, which is the readable document a value brand's first-party system does not give and which a small brand's price carries by selling fewer products at a higher margin than a value brand's; it is not enrolled in a sports certification programme, which the page states. It is 1500mg magnesium bisglycinate stated as 300mg elemental at 80% NRV, two capsules with the evening meal, with a UK address on the tub, 180 capsules for £19.99 at 22p a day. The full label breakdown is here.

The verdict: a value vitamin brand's testing is sized to its price. It runs first-party release testing in a facility registered under the American manufacturing rules, which is a real process a regulator inspects, and it does not generally run lot-by-lot independent certification, which a cost floor cannot carry. The one independent mark such a brand carries is the pharmacopoeia's verification, confirmed product by product in its public database rather than assumed from the label; and a UK buyer adds the importer's address and the expiry, which no mark supplies.

What to check on the label

Questions people also ask

Are value brand vitamins tested at all?

Yes, first party: a brand built to a cost floor runs the testing the floor affords, release testing of each batch for identity and assay in its own or a contract laboratory and periodic contaminant testing, as the American manufacturing rules require of every registered facility, with the records kept for the federal agency's inspectors; what it does not generally run is lot-by-lot third-party certification published by lot number, because a fee per product and per lot is a cost the margin does not contain, so the label's tested for quality describes the maker testing its own product.

What does third party tested mean on a vitamin label?

In the international vocabulary of conformity assessment, a test performed by a body independent of both the maker and the user, such as a certification programme screening each lot, an accredited laboratory commissioned by neither side or an independent service buying at retail; a first-party test is the maker testing its own product and a second-party test is a user testing it; a value brand's testing is first party by definition, and a label reading laboratory tested describes the first party in words that sound like the third, which is the loose use the question is really about.

How do I check if a specific value brand vitamin is verified?

Search the American pharmacopoeia's dietary supplement verification database for the product by name, since the programme audits the manufacturer, tests the product for identity, strength, purity and disintegration, surveys retail samples and lists verified products publicly; a value brand typically has some products verified and others not, so the answer differs between tubs from the same brand, a product that is listed is third-party verified in the programme's sense, and a product that is not listed is first-party tested only, however the label reads.

Does American facility registration mean a brand is third party tested?

It means a third-party audit of the process and not a third-party test of any lot: a facility registered with the federal agency is subject to the current good manufacturing practice rules for supplements, which require written procedures, ingredient identity testing, finished-product specifications and release against them, batch records and complaint handling, and the agency inspects against those rules and publishes warning letters when a facility fails; a brand made there has a documented process a regulator checks, and a buyer still cannot read a certificate for their own batch.

Is this site's magnesium third party tested?

Yes in the lot sense, which a small brand's price carries by selling fewer products at a higher margin than a value brand's: each batch is tested by an independent UK contract laboratory for lead, mercury, arsenic and cadmium with the certificate for a lot number released on request, alongside first-party release testing in a UK facility certified to GMP and BRC; it is not enrolled in a sports certification programme, which the page states; it carries a UK address and states 300mg elemental at 80% NRV in two capsules with the evening meal at 22p a day.

Sources

1. The American pharmacopoeia's dietary supplement verification programme: a voluntary mark awarded after a manufacturing audit, testing of the product for identity, strength, purity and disintegration, and ongoing surveillance testing of retail samples, used mainly by American mass-market brands and listed in a public database. https://www.usp.org/verification-services/dietary-supplements-verification-program
2. The international vocabulary of conformity assessment: a first-party assessment is performed by the organisation that provides the product, a second-party by a person or organisation with a user interest in it, and a third-party by a body independent of both provider and user, which is the definition the phrase third-party tested borrows and often fails to meet. https://www.iso.org/standard/73029.html
3. The US dietary supplement manufacturing framework, 21 CFR Part 111: current good manufacturing practice requirements for dietary supplement manufacturers, with facility registration and inspection by the Food and Drug Administration, the regime under which an American supplement facility operates. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-111
4. The batch release and certificate of analysis framework: a product has a written specification for identity, assay, contaminants and physical properties, each batch is tested against it before release, and the certificate of analysis for a batch reports the results against the specification, so that batch-to-batch consistency is read by comparing certificates across lot numbers. PubMed record

Related answers

• What are the best third party tested supplements?
• What are some reputable, third-party tested supplement brands in the UK?
• What should you look for in third party tested vitamins UK?
• Are Amazon supplements 3rd party tested?
• What should you look for in list of third-party tested supplements?
• Is NOW supplements third-party tested?