What are the best supplements for reducing cortisol levels?

Two axes instead of a ranking: why a cortisol supplement is bought on its reduction and its record together, the population every point was measured in, and the first three candidates plotted

What are the best supplements for reducing cortisol levels is a question that every list answers with a ranking on one axis, how much cortisol fell, and that a buyer actually pays on two, because a supplement taken every day for a hormone that is probably normal is a purchase of its adverse-event record as much as of its effect. The useful tool is a plot rather than a list: each candidate is placed by the size of the cortisol reduction the trials measured, on the first axis, and by its documented record, on the second, and a buyer reads the coordinates together. A large reduction with a long record and a small reduction with a clean one are different purchases, and the shelf, which prints only the first axis, cannot tell them apart.

Before any point is placed, the population every point was measured in has to be stated, because it moves the whole plot. The cortisol trials that produced the reductions recruited chronically stressed adults with raised perceived stress scores and, usually, raised baseline cortisol, and measured the fall over a couple of months against placebo; none recruited people with normal cortisol, and in a person whose cortisol is normal the reduction a trial found has no reason to appear and no reason to be wanted, since a normal curve lowered is not corrected but interfered with. The measurement that would place a buyer on the plot is a timed saliva series across the day, or a twenty-four-hour collection, read against a reference range by a doctor, and almost nobody buying these products has done it; they have inferred raised cortisol from stress, poor sleep and a waistline, which are three things with many causes. The plot is therefore a plot for the stressed-with-raised-scores population, and a buyer who is not in it is reading someone else's coordinates.

The first point is ashwagandha root extract, and it sits at the highest reduction on the plot with the longest record. In several randomised trials of stressed adults it lowered measured cortisol by a moderate margin against placebo alongside falls in rated stress, which is the strongest effect on the first axis; on the second axis it carries documented cases of liver injury attributed to the extract in the pharmacovigilance literature, an effect on thyroid hormone levels that makes it a doctor's question for anyone with a thyroid condition or on thyroid medicine, and advice to avoid it in pregnancy. Its coordinates are moderate reduction, meaningful record, and that is the whole case for and against it in one pair. The second point is phosphatidylserine, which in trials of exercising men at several hundred milligrams a day blunted the cortisol response to hard exercise by a small margin with no safety signal, placing it at small reduction, clean record, in a population that is lifters rather than stressed office workers, and at a price in pounds a day that is its real cost. The third point is rhodiola, with trials showing reductions in rated fatigue and stress and inconsistent or unmeasured effects on cortisol itself, placing it at uncertain reduction, clean record.

Three points placed by two coordinates and a population the plot belongs to, and the remaining candidates, the blends off the plot, the thing that moves cortisol more than any point, and the worked example, which is the next section.

The remaining candidates plotted, the blends that are off the plot entirely, what lowers cortisol more than any point and sits at zero on the record axis, the worked example at its own point, and the verdict

The fourth point is omega-3, which in one trial at a few grams a day lowered morning cortisol by a small margin in healthy adults and in others did nothing to it, placing it at small reduction in one trial, clean record at ordinary doses, and bought by anyone eating no oily fish for its own authorised claims rather than for this axis. The fifth point is the medicinal mushrooms, reishi, cordyceps and lion's mane, sold for cortisol on an adaptogen story and placed at no measured reduction, because the human trials that measured cortisol found nothing or did not measure it, with a clean record for lion's mane and a liver signal for reishi in the case reports. The sixth point is magnesium, which has an authorised claim for normal psychological function and no cortisol trial of size, placed at no measured reduction, clean record, and taken for a short plate rather than for the axis. Vitamin C at gram doses blunted the exercise cortisol response in a few small trials in athletes, a small point in the lifter's population with a clean record. L-theanine lowered the cortisol response to an acute stress task in small trials, a small acute point rather than a daily reduction.

The blends are off the plot entirely, and the reason is the one that matters most for a buyer in this category. The cortisol formulas, the adrenal support products and the stress complexes combine three to eight of the candidates above at doses below the trialled ones, and no blend has ever been trialled as a blend, so there is no coordinate on the first axis to plot, while the record axis inherits every ingredient's record, including ashwagandha's, at a dose too low to deliver its effect. A product that cannot be plotted cannot be bought on evidence, and the blends are the most expensive items on the shelf by a wide margin.

What lowers cortisol more than any point on the plot sits at zero on the record axis and costs nothing. Regular training lowers the cortisol response to the same workload and to psychological stressors over time, an adaptation of the stress axis itself that persists for as long as training continues; a consistent wake time and morning light sharpen the curve's shape; and sleep extension lowers evening cortisol in the people whose evening was raised by short nights. A lifter asking this question has the largest cortisol intervention in the research already in their programme, and the plot's points are small adjustments beside it.

The worked example is placed at its own point, which is no measured reduction and a clean record: {FL}, 1500mg magnesium bisglycinate stated as 300mg elemental at 80% NRV, two capsules with the evening meal, with authorised claims for normal psychological function, normal nervous system function and the reduction of tiredness and fatigue, no cortisol claim, which this page does not make, batch tested for lead, mercury, arsenic and cadmium, UK made, 180 capsules for £19.99 at 22p a day, taken for a plate the survey finds a share of adults short of. The full label breakdown is here.

The verdict: the best supplements for reducing cortisol are read off a two-axis plot, not a ranking. Ashwagandha has the largest measured reduction and a liver and thyroid record that most buyers should weigh against a hormone they have not measured; phosphatidylserine is small and clean in exercising men at a price in pounds; rhodiola is uncertain and clean; omega-3 is small in one trial; the mushrooms and magnesium have no measured reduction; and the blends cannot be plotted. Every point belongs to stressed adults with raised scores, and regular training moves the hormone more than any of them for nothing.

What to check on the label

Questions people also ask

What is the number one supplement for lowering cortisol?

By the size of the measured reduction, ashwagandha root extract, which lowered cortisol by a moderate margin in randomised trials of stressed adults alongside falls in rated stress; by the two axes a buyer actually pays on, it is also the candidate with the longest record, documented liver injury cases, thyroid hormone effects and avoidance in pregnancy, which most buyers should weigh against a hormone they have not measured, while phosphatidylserine is small and clean in exercising men and the blends cannot be plotted at all.

Do cortisol supplements work if your cortisol is normal?

There is no evidence they do and no reason they should: every reduction on the plot was measured in chronically stressed adults with raised scores and usually raised baseline cortisol, a normal curve lowered is interfered with rather than corrected, and the only way to know which group a person is in is a timed saliva series or a twenty-four-hour collection read against a reference range by a doctor, which almost nobody buying these products has done; stress, poor sleep and a waistline are not a measurement.

Is phosphatidylserine good for cortisol?

It sits at the small-and-clean point on the plot: in trials of exercising men at several hundred milligrams a day it blunted the cortisol response to hard exercise by a small margin with no safety signal, which makes it the only candidate with a measured effect and a clean record, in a population that is lifters rather than stressed office workers, at a price in pounds a day that is its real cost against a small effect; it is a defensible purchase for a lifter who has already fixed training, sleep and caffeine and wants the small adjustment.

Are cortisol blends and adrenal support supplements worth it?

No, because they cannot be plotted: the formulas combine three to eight of the candidates at doses below the trialled ones, no blend has ever been trialled as a blend, so there is no measured reduction to place on the first axis, while the record axis inherits every ingredient's record, including ashwagandha's, at a dose too low to deliver its effect; a product that cannot be bought on evidence is bought on marketing, and the blends are the most expensive items on the shelf.

Does magnesium reduce cortisol?

No measured reduction of size in the trials, and this page makes no cortisol claim for it; magnesium has authorised claims for normal psychological function, normal nervous system function and the reduction of tiredness and fatigue, which describe the mineral's role, and the worked example sits at the no-reduction, clean-record point of the plot at 300mg elemental, 80% NRV, two capsules with the evening meal for 22p a day, batch tested for four metals and UK made, taken for a plate the national survey finds a share of adults short of.

Sources

1. The ashwagandha trial literature: small randomised studies of Withania somnifera root extracts on stress and cortisol measures, typically standardised by withanolide content, with no authorised UK claim resulting. PubMed record
2. The phosphatidylserine and cortisol literature: small trials at 600 to 800mg a day reported a blunted cortisol response to exercise or mental stress, with inconsistent results at lower doses and no authorised claim. PubMed record
3. The cortisol measurement methods literature: cortisol is sampled in serum, saliva and hair, with saliva reflecting free cortisol at a time point, hair reflecting cumulative exposure over months, and timing against the diurnal rhythm and the awakening response the main sources of error in any trial claiming a change. PubMed record
4. The herb-induced liver injury literature: documented case reports of liver injury associated with botanical supplements including ashwagandha and high-dose green tea extract, rare but recognised in hepatology. PubMed record

Related answers

• What are the best cortisol-lowering supplements for women in the UK?
• What are the best third party tested supplements?
• Are Amazon supplements 3rd party tested?
• Are NOW supplements on Amazon legit?
• What are the best made supplements?
• Which supplements are approved by Informed Sport?