Who makes 21st century supplements?

Who makes is the first of five questions: the five hands a US value brand's tub passes through to reach a UK buyer, and which one is answerable under UK law

Who makes 21st Century supplements is a question with a short answer and a longer, more useful one. The short answer is that the brand belongs to an American mass-market vitamin manufacturer that presses its own tablets in its own facility in the United States and sells them at the lowest price per bottle through supermarkets, pharmacies and online, so that the maker and the brand are the same company, which is more than most supplement brands can say, since most are marketing companies that buy from a contract manufacturer and the question who makes it has a different answer from the name on the tub. The longer answer is that who makes it is the first of five questions a UK buyer should ask about an imported tub and the least useful of the five, because the tub passes through five hands before it reaches a UK kitchen and the one that matters under UK law is the fourth. Hand one is the manufacturer, the US company's own facility, operating under American food and supplement manufacturing rules and the brand's own quality system. Hand two is the brand owner, the same company, who sets the specification, the forms, the doses and the label. Hand three is the exporter or distributor, the firm that buys pallets from the brand and moves them out of the United States, with no responsibility for anything beyond the shipping. Hand four is the UK importer: whoever first places the tub on the UK market, and under the food information regulations the food business operator under whose name a food is marketed is responsible for the information on it, which for an imported food means the importer must ensure a label in English, the mandatory food supplement particulars, amounts declared against the UK nutrient reference values, and a UK or EU address, and is the person a trading standards officer, a court or a customer with a problem writes to. Hand five is the seller, the marketplace account or shop the buyer actually paid, which may be the importer itself, an authorised reseller buying from the importer, or an anonymous account that bought a pallet abroad, listed it, and skipped hand four entirely.

The fifth hand is where the useful question lives, because the brand, the maker and the tablets are identical in every case and the difference between a lawful import and a grey one is entirely whether hand four was performed. A tub that passed through an authorised importer carries that importer's UK address on an over-label or a converted panel, declares micrograms and milligrams against UK reference values, says food supplement in English with the required warnings, and has a company a buyer can write to. A tub that skipped hand four carries the US Supplement Facts panel alone, international units and percent daily values, an American address, and no UK operator, which means that nobody in the United Kingdom is answerable for it: the manufacturer is beyond the reach of UK food law, the exporter never had a duty, the seller is an account name, and the consumer rights act has a counterparty only if the account can be found. Who makes it is answered well by this brand; who imported it is answered by the label's address and the seller's name, and that is the question a UK buyer asks.

What the forum reviews can and cannot tell, how to read the label's address and the seller's name, the worked example with one hand, and the honest verdict

The searches that bring people to this question usually also search for the brand's reviews on forums, and those reviews can tell three things and cannot tell three others. They can tell how the tablets felt to the people who took them, whether the bottle count was right and the seal intact, and how the brand's customer service answered when written to from the United States, which is the market most forum reviewers are in. They cannot tell whether the tub a UK buyer is looking at was imported lawfully, since the reviewer's tub was bought in a different country through a different fifth hand; whether the batch in hand matches its label, since no reviewer has analysed theirs; or whether the form is the right one for the buyer's purpose, since a review says the magnesium worked for me and not that it was oxide at a stated elemental dose. A forum review of an American value brand is a review of hands one and two, which are fine, and says nothing about hand four, which is the UK buyer's whole question. Reading hand four takes a minute. The label's address: a UK or EU address on an over-label or a converted panel means an importer performed the duty, and a US address alone means nobody did. The seller's name: the brand's own authorised UK route or a named UK company with a registered address means hand five is also hand four or buys from it, and a string of consonants shipping from a fulfilment centre on another continent means hand five skipped hand four. The declaration: micrograms and milligrams against nutrient reference values means a converted label, and international units with percent daily values means an unconverted one.

The worked example has one hand between the maker and the buyer, which is the simplest possible chain and the reason it is used here: {FL} is made in the UK on a GMP and BRC audited site for the brand that owns it, sold on the marketplace by the brand itself, and carries the operator's name and UK address on the label, so that hands one, two, four and five are the same company and hand three does not exist; the label declares 1500mg magnesium bisglycinate as 300mg elemental at 80% NRV against the UK reference value, carries every mandatory particular in English, states four authorised claims and no others, and is backed by a batch certificate for lead, mercury, arsenic and cadmium on request, 180 capsules for £19.99 at 22p a day. The honest verdict on who makes 21st Century supplements is that an American value manufacturer that makes its own products has answered the first question better than most of the shelf, that the forum reviews describing those products are reviews of the first two hands and say nothing about the fourth, and that a UK buyer holding a tub asks who imported it, reads the answer off the label's address and the seller's name, and buys the tub that has someone in the United Kingdom answerable for it or buys a tub that was never imported at all.

What to check on the label

Questions people also ask

Who manufactures 21st Century vitamins?

The brand belongs to an American mass-market vitamin manufacturer that presses its own tablets in its own facility in the United States, so the maker and the brand owner are the same company, which is more than most supplement brands can say, since most are marketing companies buying from a contract manufacturer; for a UK buyer, though, who makes it is the first of five questions about an imported tub and the least useful, because the hand that is answerable under UK law is the importer who first placed the tub on the UK market, read off the label's address and the seller's name.

Are 21st Century supplements made in the USA?

Yes, in the brand owner's own facility, which answers the manufacturing question cleanly; what a UK buyer then needs to know is how the tub travelled from that facility to them, through an exporter, a UK importer who under the food information regulations becomes responsible for an English label with the mandatory particulars, UK nutrient reference values and a UK or EU address, and a seller, or through an anonymous marketplace account that bought a pallet abroad and skipped the importer's duties entirely, leaving a tub with a US panel, international units and nobody in the United Kingdom answerable for it.

What do the forum reviews of 21st Century supplements actually tell me?

Three things: how the tablets felt to the people who took them, whether the bottle count was right and the seal intact, and how the brand's customer service answered from the United States, which is where most forum reviewers are; and not three others: whether the tub a UK buyer is looking at was imported lawfully, since the reviewer bought in a different country through a different seller, whether the batch in hand matches its label, since no reviewer has analysed theirs, and whether the form is right for the purpose, since a review says it worked for me and not that it was oxide at a stated elemental dose.

How can I tell if an American supplement was imported legally into the UK?

Three reads on the tub and the listing: the address, where a UK or EU address on an over-label or a converted panel means an importer performed the duty and a US address alone means nobody did; the seller's name, where the brand's own authorised UK route or a named UK company with a registered address means the seller is or buys from the importer and an anonymous account shipping from another continent means it skipped the importer; and the declaration, where micrograms and milligrams against nutrient reference values with the words food supplement in English mean a converted label and international units with percent daily values mean an unconverted one.

Does it matter who imported my supplements if the brand is good?

It is the only thing that matters once the brand is good, because the brand, the maker and the tablets are identical in a lawful import and a grey one, and the difference is whether anyone in the United Kingdom is answerable for the tub: the importer is the food business operator a trading standards officer, a court or a customer with a problem writes to, and the consumer rights act's remedies need a counterparty; a tub that skipped the importer has a manufacturer beyond UK law, an exporter with no duty, and a seller that is an account name, so a buyer with a bad batch has a good brand and nobody to turn to.

Sources

1. The food information regulations on responsibility: the food business operator under whose name a food is marketed is responsible for the information, and for a food imported from outside the UK that operator is the importer, who must ensure a compliant label in English with a UK or EU address. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eur/2011/1169/article/8
2. The retained Food Information to Consumers regulation: the mandatory nutrition declaration for foods, its fixed order of energy, fat, saturates, carbohydrate, sugars, protein and salt per 100g, and its rules on portion information, with supplements declaring nutrients per daily dose against nutrient reference values. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eur/2011/1169/contents
3. The US Supplement Facts panel rules, 21 CFR 101.36: serving size and servings per container, amount per serving with percent Daily Value, an asterisk where no Daily Value is established, proprietary blends declared by total weight, and other ingredients listed below the panel. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-101/subpart-D/section-101.36
4. The counterfeit supplement literature: falsified and counterfeit dietary supplements are documented on online marketplaces, concentrated in high-value branded categories, with seller verification and packaging inspection the principal consumer defences. PubMed record

Related answers

• Why 21st Century supplements so cheap?
• 21st Century supplements from which country review: is it worth it for lifters?
• 21st century supplements wiki review: is it worth it for lifters?
• What should you look for in 21st century supplements fake?
• Who makes the most trusted supplements?
• Are 21st Century vitamins third party tested?