What are the top 5 gym supplements for muscle growth?

The entry requirement: a register claim that touches muscle or a class A institute entry, why a top-five list needs one before it names anyone, and the five applicants that pass

What are the top five gym supplements for muscle growth is a question every shelf answers with five products it sells, and the lists differ because the shelves differ, which tells the buyer that the lists were written backwards from the stock. A list written forwards sets an entry requirement before it fills a seat, and the requirement this page uses has two doors, either of which admits an applicant. The first door is the register of authorised health claims, which lists the claims a food or supplement may lawfully make in Great Britain after a scientific assessment: an applicant that holds a claim naming muscle, muscle function, muscle mass or physical performance has passed an assessment of the evidence that the shelf did not run. The second door is the classification a national sports institute publishes, which sorts supplements into classes by evidence, with class A reserved for those with evidence of a performance benefit in a specific situation when used according to a protocol; an applicant in class A has passed a review the institute's own scientists ran for their own athletes. An applicant that walks through neither door is not on this list, however many tubs of it the shelf sells, and that one rule removes most of the shelf.

Five applicants pass. Creatine monohydrate holds an authorised claim for increasing physical performance in successive bursts of short-term, high-intensity exercise, and a class A entry, and behind both sits the largest body of strength and lean-mass meta-analyses any supplement has, with a few grams a day of monohydrate producing a measurable strength gain over resistance training alone. Protein holds authorised claims for growth in muscle mass and maintenance of muscle mass, and a class A entry, with the dose-response meta-analysis finding that total daily protein drives lean-mass gain from lifting up to a threshold near one point six grams per kilogram, beyond which more adds nothing measurable. Caffeine holds a class A entry for performance, with the meta-analyses finding a small gain in strength and a larger one in endurance of effort at doses of a few milligrams per kilogram, which the register treats with caution and which a person sensitive to it reads before using. Vitamin D holds an authorised claim for normal muscle function, and the UK survey finds a share of adults below the threshold through the winter, so that its seat is a correction rather than an enhancement: a man who is low gains muscle function back, and a man who is replete gains nothing by taking more. Carbohydrate holds a class A entry for the session, with the glycogen literature finding that a lifter training hard and often with a low carbohydrate intake trains worse, so that a carbohydrate around the session is a supplement in the institute's sense, whether it comes as a powder or a plate.

The requirement and the five that pass, with the applicants that failed, the seat the plate usually fills, the worked example applying on its own claims, the training the five sit on, and the verdict in the next section.

The applicants that failed and why; the seat the plate usually fills; the worked example applying on its own register claims; the training underneath; and the verdict

The applicants that failed are named by category, because the shelf's lists are full of them. Testosterone boosters have no register claim and no class A entry, and the audits of the ingredients they contain find the acute-hormone literature does not translate into muscle in a man with normal levels. Branched-chain amino acids have no claim and no class A entry, because the leucine they supply is already in any protein that meets the daily total, and the trials of BCAAs on top of adequate protein find nothing. HMB has no register claim and a class A entry only in a narrow situation that is not the trained lifter, in whom the trials are null. Glutamine, arginine and the nitric-oxide precursors sold for the pump have no claim and no class A entry for muscle. The pre-workout blends are caffeine with passengers at undeclared doses, so that the caffeine's seat does not transfer to the blend. The mass gainers that sell on anything other than their calories, which is the plate in a tub, fail on every ingredient that is not protein or carbohydrate. None of this is a judgment on whether a product is pleasant to take; it is the entry requirement applied, and the applicants that fail it are the ones a shelf promotes hardest because they carry the margin.

One of the five seats is usually filled by the plate. The UK survey finds men who lift eating protein at or near the daily total the meta-analysis found sufficient, from meat, fish, eggs, dairy and pulses, so that protein's seat is a powder only for the man whose count on a training day falls short, and then only for the gap, which is the cheapest of the five seats to fill from food and the most expensive to fill from a tub sold on a flavour. Carbohydrate's seat is the plate too for most lifters, and becomes a powder only in the narrow case of two sessions close together. The five seats are therefore two products most lifters buy, creatine and vitamin D through the winter, one they take as a coffee, and two they eat.

The worked example applies on its own claims and is placed honestly, because it does not hold a muscle-growth claim and this page does not give it one: {FL}, 1500mg magnesium bisglycinate stated as 300mg elemental at 80% NRV, two capsules with the evening meal, holds authorised claims for normal muscle function and normal protein synthesis, the same muscle-function door vitamin D walked through, and the survey finds a share of young men below the reference intake; its seat, like vitamin D's, is a correction for a plate that is short, with nothing to add for a plate that is not. It is batch tested for four metals, UK made under GMP and BRC, 180 capsules for £19.99 at 22p a day. The full label breakdown is here.

The training underneath is stated last because the shelf leaves it out: the five seats sit on top of progressive resistance training with enough hard sets per muscle per week, sleep, and a protein total met from the plate, and the strength meta-analyses that admit creatine measured its effect on top of that training and not instead of it. The verdict: set the entry requirement first, a register claim that touches muscle or a class A institute entry, and five pass: creatine monohydrate, protein, caffeine, vitamin D and carbohydrate around the session. The boosters, the BCAAs, the HMB, the glutamine and the blends fail, the protein and carbohydrate seats are usually the plate, and a magnesium holds a muscle-function claim for a plate that is short and nothing beyond it.

What to check on the label

Questions people also ask

Which 5 supplements are best for muscle growth?

The five that pass an entry requirement set before the list is written, either an authorised claim on the register that touches muscle or performance or a class A entry at a national sports institute: creatine monohydrate, with a performance claim and the strength meta-analyses; protein, with a muscle-mass claim and the dose-response meta-analysis near one point six grams per kilogram a day; caffeine, with a class A entry for performance; vitamin D, with a muscle-function claim and a UK winter shortfall to correct; and carbohydrate around the session, with a class A entry; the five sit on top of progressive training and sleep, and two of the seats are usually the plate.

Do testosterone boosters build muscle?

Not in a man with normal levels: the boosters hold no register claim and no class A entry, the audits of their ingredients find no trial in which a booster added muscle to resistance training in healthy men, and the acute hormone fluctuations after a session, which the marketing leans on, do not predict muscle gain in the hypertrophy literature; a man with symptoms of low testosterone has a doctor's blood test to read rather than a tub, and the money spent on a booster is the creatine and the vitamin D seats paid for several times over.

Are BCAAs worth taking for muscle growth?

No, on the entry requirement and on the trials: branched-chain amino acids hold no register claim and no class A entry, the leucine they supply is already present in any complete protein that meets the daily total, and the trials of BCAAs added to adequate protein find no additional muscle gain, with one review finding the amino acid profile incomplete for building muscle on its own; a lifter whose protein total is short fills it with protein, which contains the BCAAs and the rest, and a lifter whose total is met has nothing for BCAAs to add.

Do I need protein powder to build muscle?

Only for the gap on a training day: the dose-response meta-analysis found lean-mass gain from lifting rising with total daily protein up to a threshold near one point six grams per kilogram and flat beyond it, and the UK survey finds men who lift eating at or near that total from meat, fish, eggs, dairy and pulses, so that protein's seat on the list is usually filled by the plate; a powder is a convenient and often cheaper way to close a shortfall of twenty or thirty grams on a day the plate falls short, and a flavour's price for protein that the plate already supplied.

Is this site's magnesium a muscle growth supplement?

No, and it is placed on its own claims: it holds authorised claims for normal muscle function and normal protein synthesis, the same muscle-function door vitamin D passes through, and the UK survey finds a share of young men below the reference intake, so that its seat is a correction for a plate that is short rather than a growth supplement, with nothing to add for a plate that is not; the label reads 1500mg magnesium bisglycinate as 300mg elemental at 80% NRV in two capsules with the evening meal, batch tested for four metals, UK made under GMP and BRC, at 22p a day, taken after the five seats and the training they sit on.

Sources

1. Retained Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods, and the Great Britain nutrition and health claims register. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/great-britain-nutrition-and-health-claims-nhc-register
2. The Australian Institute of Sport supplement framework: supplements are grouped as A, with strong evidence for use in specific situations, B, with emerging evidence deserving further research, C, with little evidence of benefit, and D, banned or at high risk of contamination, the classification used by sports institutes to decide what athletes are given. https://www.ais.gov.au/nutrition/supplements
3. Rawson ES, Volek JS. Effects of creatine supplementation and resistance training on muscle strength and weightlifting performance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 2003;17(4):822-831: creatine with resistance training produced around 8 per cent greater gains in maximal strength and around 14 per cent greater gains in repetitions at a given load than training alone. PubMed record
4. Morton RW, et al. A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of protein supplementation on resistance training-induced gains in muscle mass and strength. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2018;52(6):376-384: protein supplementation added around 0.3kg of fat-free mass, with the benefit plateauing at total intakes around 1.6g per kilogram a day. PubMed record

Related answers

• What are the best supplements for muscle growth and testosterone in the UK?
• What are the best supplements for muscle growth over 50 in the UK?
• What are the top 5 supplements for men?
• What are the best supplements for muscle growth after 40?
• What are the best supplements for muscle growth after 40 woman?
• What are the best supplements for muscle gain in the UK?