Who should not consume lion's mane?

The warning box drafted: the lines the law requires on every supplement and why, and the three lines the data requires for this mushroom, each with the reason it exists

Who should not consume lion's mane is a question whose answer already has a format, because the people who should not consume a supplement are the people its label has to warn, and a warning box on a tub is a list of exactly those people with the reasons compressed out. The honest way to answer is to draft the box as it should read, line by line, and to put the reasons back in. The first lines are not the mushroom's but the law's. The UK's food supplement regulations require every supplement label to carry the words food supplement, the recommended daily dose, a warning not to exceed it, a statement that the product should not be used as a substitute for a varied diet, a warning to keep it out of reach of young children, and the names and quantities of its active ingredients; those lines exist because the regulations treat a supplement as a food that is nevertheless concentrated, dosed and capable of being overtaken by a child, and a lion's mane tub without them is unlawful before any question about the mushroom is asked. Do not exceed the stated dose is the law's version of the dose axis, and for lion's mane it protects against nothing worse than the digestive event that grams of beta-glucan produce; keep out of reach of young children is the law's version of a concern that applies to every capsule in a house.

The next three lines are the mushroom's own, and each has a reason that can be stated in a sentence. Not suitable for pregnant or breastfeeding women: the line exists because every human lion's mane trial screened pregnant and nursing women out, so that no data exists either way, and a responsible label treats no data about a concentrated extract as a reason not to take it rather than as permission; cooked lion's mane as a food on a plate is a different object, covered by ordinary food advice, which the next page in this series addresses. Not suitable for anyone with an allergy to mushrooms or moulds: the line exists because the mushroom's one acute adverse event in the case report literature is allergic, rash, itching, swelling of the lips or face, wheeze within minutes to two hours, and because mushroom proteins cross-react with airborne mould allergens, so that a person with mould allergy or asthma is the person most likely to react; it is the only line in the box that describes a known harm rather than an absence of data. Not for under-18s: the line exists because no trial enrolled anyone under eighteen, because the growing nervous system is exactly the territory the mushroom's unproven mechanism story concerns, and because this site gives no supplement guidance to minors as a matter of policy; a teenager asking is answered with sleep, food and training, and a parent asking is answered with the same line.

The pharmacist lines and the surgery line, the lines a label must not carry, the two groups that are often wrongly added to the box, and the honest buy

The pharmacist lines come next, and they are phrased as a conversation rather than a prohibition because that is what the evidence supports. Consult a pharmacist before use if you are taking anticoagulant or antiplatelet medication, diabetes medication or an immunosuppressant: the line exists because lion's mane has three bench signals, effects seen in a test tube or an animal and never in a person, on platelet aggregation, on blood glucose in rodents with induced diabetes, and on immune cell receptors through its beta-glucans, each of which touches a system that one of those medicine classes is managing, and a pharmacist with the full medicine list can say in five minutes whether the theoretical concern applies. Stop taking one to two weeks before surgery and tell the anaesthetist: the line exists because of the platelet signal and because the perioperative guidance advises stopping most supplements before an operation on the same basis. Anyone with reduced kidney function should clear any supplement with their renal team, which is a line about the cadmium a fungus concentrates and the kidney stores rather than about the mushroom itself. Then come the lines a label must not carry, which are as much a part of the honest box as the warnings: a food supplement label may not carry any health claim that is not authorised, and may not state or imply that the product prevents, treats or cures any disease, so that a lion's mane tub saying it supports focus, memory, nerves, mood, sleep or the nervous system is carrying a line the law forbids, no fungus holding any authorised claim at all. A box that warns correctly on the back while the front claims unlawfully is a box on a tub the buyer should put back, because a brand that prints a forbidden line has told the buyer something about its other lines.

Two groups are often added to the box online and do not belong in it, and the honest draft removes them. People on antidepressants are frequently warned off lion's mane on the strength of forum theories about serotonin, and there is no basis: the mushroom has no serotonergic activity in any assay, no effect on the liver enzymes that metabolise antidepressants, no interaction documented in a human, and the pharmacist conversation that the box does require is for the three medicine classes named, not for this one, so that a person on an antidepressant who wants to take the mushroom can, with the ordinary rule of one new thing at a time and the ordinary advice to mention any supplement at their next review. Tested athletes are the second group wrongly added, on the strength of the word mushroom: lion's mane contains no psilocybin, no stimulant and nothing on any anti-doping prohibited list, appears on no drug test panel, and is a food, so that an athlete's only genuine concern is the batch certificate and the supply chain, which is the concern they should have about every supplement. The box, drafted honestly, therefore reads: the law's six lines; not for pregnant or breastfeeding women, not for mushroom or mould allergy, not for under-18s; a pharmacist first for four medicine classes and a stop before surgery; the renal team for reduced kidney function; and no claim anywhere. The honest buy is a tub whose box reads that way and whose front reads as nothing: the worked example, {FLLM}, is a stated 5:1 fruiting body extract labelled 1500mg mushroom equivalent per capsule, 120 days for £15.49 at 13p, UK made under GMP and BRC, independently lab tested per batch, with the exclusions printed, the law's lines present and no forbidden sentence on the front to contradict them.

What to check on the label

Questions people also ask

Can pregnant women take lion's mane?

Not as a concentrated supplement, by the data's absence rather than by any known harm: every human lion's mane trial screened pregnant and breastfeeding women out, so nothing is known either way, and a responsible label and this site treat that as a reason not to take an extract; a woman trying to conceive is in the same position, since the window begins before a test is positive, and cooked lion's mane as an ordinary food on a plate is a different object covered by ordinary food advice.

Can you take lion's mane if you are allergic to mushrooms?

No; allergy is the one line in the warning box that describes a known harm, since the mushroom's acute adverse events in the case reports are allergic, rash, itching, swelling of the lips or face and wheeze within minutes to two hours, and mushroom proteins cross-react with airborne mould allergens, so that anyone with a known mushroom allergy, a mould allergy or asthma triggered by damp is the person most likely to react and should not take it in any form.

Can teenagers take lion's mane?

No; no trial has enrolled anyone under eighteen, the growing nervous system is precisely the territory the mushroom's unproven mechanism story concerns, and this site gives no supplement guidance to minors as a matter of policy; a teenager asking about focus or energy is answered with sleep, food, training and a conversation with a parent or doctor, and a parent asking on their behalf is answered with the same line on the box.

Can I take lion's mane with antidepressants?

There is no basis for the warning that circulates online: the mushroom has no serotonergic activity in any assay, no effect on the liver enzymes that metabolise antidepressants, and no interaction documented in a human, and the pharmacist conversation the box requires is for anticoagulant, antiplatelet, diabetes and immunosuppressant medication rather than for this class; the ordinary rules apply, one new thing at a time, and mention any supplement at the next medication review.

What should a lion's mane label say and not say?

By law it must say food supplement, the recommended daily dose, do not exceed the stated dose, not a substitute for a varied diet, keep out of reach of young children, and the names and quantities of its active ingredients; by the data it should exclude pregnancy, breastfeeding, mushroom or mould allergy and under-18s, and direct four medicine classes to a pharmacist; and it must not carry any claim to focus, memory, nerves, mood or anything else, since no fungus holds an authorised one, and a tub that prints a forbidden sentence on the front has discredited its own box.

Sources

1. The UK food supplement labelling regulations: a food supplement label must carry the words food supplement, the recommended daily dose, a warning not to exceed it, a statement that supplements should not replace a varied diet, a warning to keep out of reach of young children, and the names and quantities of the active ingredients, and must not carry any health claim that is not authorised or any statement that the product prevents, treats or cures disease. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2003/1387/contents/made
2. The mushroom allergy literature: allergy to edible fungi is uncommon but documented, presenting as oral itching, urticaria, angioedema, asthma or anaphylaxis, with cross-reactivity between mushroom proteins and airborne mould allergens reported, so that people with mould allergy or asthma are the group most likely to react to a mushroom supplement. PubMed record
3. The Hericium erinaceus safety literature: animal and in-vitro studies report effects on platelet aggregation and blood glucose, theoretical signals with no confirmed human drug interaction, warranting a pharmacist mention for anyone on anticoagulant, antiplatelet or diabetes medication. PubMed record
4. Retained Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods, and the Great Britain nutrition and health claims register. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/great-britain-nutrition-and-health-claims-nhc-register

Related answers

• What is the best way to consume lion's mane?
• What not to take with lion's mane?
• What not to mix with lion's mane?
• What medications should not be taken with lion's mane?
• Who cannot take lion's mane?
• Who should avoid lion's mane?